Staxi Corporation v. Medline Industries, LP
Staxi Corporation |
Medline Industries, LP |
3:2024cv00031 |
February 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Timothy C Batten |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #8 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Entered by CRD at the direction of Chief U.S. District Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(usw) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #8 APPLICATION for Admission of Jed Hansen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13265740).. Attorney Jed Hansen added appearing on behalf of Staxi Corporation. E-filing access may be requested after an order granting the application is entered. (djs) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION for Admission of Jed Hansen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13265740).by Staxi Corporation. (Lord, Tywanda) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 7 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (dmb) |
Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Medline Industries, LP. (dmb) |
Clerk's Notation re #4 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Reviewed and approved by Chief U.S. District Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. (usw) |
Filing 5 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Jed Hansen. Clerk to follow-up by 3/7/2024. (djs) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Staxi Corporation. (Lord, Tywanda) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED AO 120 . (Lord, Tywanda) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Staxi Corporation (Lord, Tywanda) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Staxi Corporation. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13245297) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Notice of deficiency re AO Form 121. Plaintiff must complete and file AO Form 121. See LR 3.4. Docket the form using the event AO 121, located in the Other Filings/Other Documents menu. (jkb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Staxi Corporation v. Medline Industries, LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Staxi Corporation | |
Represented By: | Jed Hansen |
Represented By: | Tywanda L. Harris Lord |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Medline Industries, LP | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.