Luo et al v. Petsmart et al
Plaintiff: Ann. Luo, Jennifer A., Natalie A. and Mary A.
Defendant: Petsmart and PetSmart headquarter
Case Number: 3:2024cv00153
Filed: August 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Timothy C Batten
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2024 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Ann. Luo, Mary A., Natalie A., Jennifer A.. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
August 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis, that Service of Process shall not issue at present time. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to submit this file to the assigned District Judge for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 8/23/2024. (jkb)
August 23, 2024 Submission of #3 Complaint, to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. for frivolity determination. (jkb)
August 23, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Ann. Luo re #2 Order ruling on IFP, Order that Service of Process shall not issue at present time. (jkb)
August 22, 2024 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (dmb)
August 20, 2024 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ann. Luo. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Letter, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(dmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luo et al v. Petsmart et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann. Luo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Petsmart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PetSmart headquarter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?