The General Conference of the Evangelical Methodist Church v. Evangelical Methodist Church of Dalton, Georgia, Inc.
Plaintiff: The General Conference of the Evangelical Methodist Church
Defendant: Evangelical Methodist Church of Dalton, Georgia, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2011cv00186
Filed: July 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Rome Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Harold L. Murphy
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The General Conference of the Evangelical Methodist Church v. Evangelical Methodist Church of Dalton, Georgia, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The General Conference of the Evangelical Methodist Church
Represented By: John Matthew Hawkins
Represented By: Robert Maddox Brinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evangelical Methodist Church of Dalton, Georgia, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory Harold Kinnamon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?