Interface, Inc. et al v. Tandus Flooring, Inc. et al
| Interface Americas, Inc., FLOR, Inc., InterfaceFLOR LLC and Interface, Inc. |
| Tandus Flooring, Inc. and Tandus Flooring US, LLC |
| 4:2013cv00046 |
| February 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Fulton |
| Harold L. Murphy |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs' 56 Motion for Reconsideration re: 55 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr., on 1/22/14. (jta)
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction 8 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Clarke B. Nelson 27 and Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude Opinio ns and Testimony of Dr. Timothy B. Jensen 37 are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review 29 is GRANTED, and this matter is STAYED until the inter partes review proceedings in the PTO, a nd all appeals, are completed. Any party may advise the Court when the inter partes review proceedings in the PTO, including all appeals, are concluded so the Court may consider whether and when to lift the stay. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr., on 11/5/13. (jta)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
