Bowling v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Company et al

Plaintiff: Terry Bowling
Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Company and Chartis Insurance Agency, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv00099
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
County: Catoosa
Presiding Judge: Harold L. Murphy
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowling v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Bowling
Represented By: Glenn Edward Roebuck, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Company
Represented By: Charles Minor McDaniel, Jr.
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Albright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chartis Insurance Agency, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Minor McDaniel, Jr.
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Albright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?