Simpson et al v. Mapco Express, Inc.
Joseph Larry Simpson and Sandra L. Simpson |
Mapco Express, Inc. |
4:2018cv00205 |
September 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Harold L Murphy |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Clerks Notation re #5 Certificate of Interested Persons approved by Judge Harold L Murphy on 10/1/2018. (dob) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Joseph Larry Simpson. (Dean, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Mapco Express, Inc.. Discovery ends on 2/19/2019.(Martin, Sean) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 3 Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons. Approved by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 9/14/18. (jta) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mapco Express, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Copec S.A. for Mapco Express, Inc.. (Martin, Sean) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Mapco Express, Inc.. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113E-8146907) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Superior Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jta) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.