Reusswig v. Stiger et al
Plaintiff: Carolyn Reusswig
Defendant: Earl Joe Muse and Shawn Stiger
Case Number: 4:2018cv00275
Filed: December 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Harold L Murphy
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE to Clerk, Superior Court of Catoosa County, Georgia re #16 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court. (dob)
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Remand to State Court and remanding this case to the Superior Court of Catoosa County, Georgia. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 1/25/2019. (dob)
January 25, 2019 Civil Case Terminated. (dob)
January 25, 2019 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Clerk, Superior Court of Catoosa County, Georgia re #16 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court, #17 Notice (Other). (dob)
January 24, 2019 Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court Joinder in Shawn Stiger's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand filed by Earl Joe Muse. (Cole, Brenton)
January 24, 2019 Filing 14 RESPONSE re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court Defendant Shawn Stiger's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 8) filed by Shawn Stiger. (Kaplan, Brent)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: The Court APPROVES the Stipulation #12 , and EXTENDS the time for Defendant Muse to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and any discovery requests served by Plaintiff until SEVEN (7) DAYS after the Court issues a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Remand to State Court. The Court further DIRECTS counsel to file any future requests for extensions of time as Motions with proposed Orders attached, rather than as stipulations, and it also DIRECTS counsel to caption all filings in this case for the Rome Division. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 1/22/19. (jta)
January 22, 2019 Submission of #12 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, to District Judge Harold L. Murphy. (jta)
January 20, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION of Extension to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Discovery by Earl Joe Muse. (Cole, Brenton)
January 11, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE by Earl Joe Muse re #1 Notice of Removal, Consent to Removal (Cole, Brenton)
January 11, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brenton Webster Cole on behalf of Earl Joe Muse (Cole, Brenton)
January 10, 2019 Filing 9 Petition for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): 01/21/2019 - 02/01/2019, by Robert G. Norred, Jr. (Norred, Robert)
January 10, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court with Brief In Support by Carolyn Reusswig. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum in Support of Motion to Remand)(Norred, Robert)
January 8, 2019 Filing 7 Petition for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): March 4 - 12, 2019, April 4 - 8, 2019, May 24 - June 4, 2019, November 25 - 29, 2019, December 23 - 27, 2019, by Brent J. Kaplan. (Kaplan, Brent)
December 20, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Shawn Stiger's Response to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories by Shawn Stiger.(Kaplan, Brent) Modified on 12/21/2018 to edit text to remove abbreviations (jta).
December 20, 2018 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Shawn Stiger's Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents by Shawn Stiger.(Kaplan, Brent) Modified on 12/21/2018 to edit text to remove abbreviations (jta).
December 19, 2018 Filing 4 Clerks Notation re #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement. Approved by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 12/19/18. (jta)
December 18, 2018 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Shawn Stiger by Shawn Stiger.(jta)
December 18, 2018 Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Shawn Stiger. Discovery ends on 5/17/2019.(jta) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
December 18, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Shawn Stiger. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113E-8337419) (Attachments: #1 Superior Ct Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jta) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reusswig v. Stiger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earl Joe Muse
Represented By: Brenton Webster Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shawn Stiger
Represented By: Brent J. Kaplan
Represented By: Hilary Wayne Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Reusswig
Represented By: Robert G. Norred, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?