Ford v. Hays State Prison
| Michael Ford |
| Unknown and Hays State Prison |
| 4:2019cv00034 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Harold L Murphy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered dismissing action without prejudice. (dob)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4
ORDER adopting #2 Final Report and Recommendation, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 3/26/2019. (dob)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (dob) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Michael Ford re #5 Clerk's Judgment, #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (dob) |
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Michael Ford, to District Judge Harold L. Murphy. (dob) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 3/1/19. (klb)
|
|
Filing 2
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Mr. Ford for his review and consideration one set of the following instructions and forms: (A) the Prisoners Guide to Filing a Civil Case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, (B) the Instructions for Filing a Complaint by Prisoners Pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983, (C) a form Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and (D) a form Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; Authorized Withdrawal Form; Certified Affidavit of Inmate Account Status. If Mr. Ford files Objections to this Final Report and Recommendation, he is ORDERED to include with those Objections either (A) the $400 due in case initiation fees for this matter or (B) a fully-completed Affidavit in Support of Request for Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, with all required signatures, authorizations, certifications, and attachments. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). Mr. Ford is advised that failure to do so may constitute an additional and independent basis for the dismissal of this matter. See N.D. Ga. R. 41.3(A)(2) (authorizing dismissal for failure to comply with a lawful court order).The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral of this case to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 3/1/19. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Michael Ford re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. ( Forms sent to party: Affidavit and Authorization; 42:1983 Forms; Instructions). (klb) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (dob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Ford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
