Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation v. Brumlow Mills, Inc.
Plaintiff: Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation
Defendant: Brumlow Mills, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2019cv00058
Filed: March 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: William M Ray
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline by which Defendant must answer, move or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended through and including August 16, 2019. Signed by Judge William M Ray, II on 7/2/19. (rlb)
July 2, 2019 Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time File Response to Complaint by Brumlow Mills, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Heard, Preston) Modified on 7/2/2019 to edit event (rlb).
June 26, 2019 Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation. Brumlow Mills, Inc. served on 6/26/2019, answer due 7/17/2019. (Bedford, Sean)
June 25, 2019 Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Brumlow Mills, Inc.(rlb)
June 24, 2019 Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation (Bedford, Sean)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William M Ray, II for all further proceedings. Judge Harold L. Murphy no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 4:19-cv-58-WMR. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 3/29/19. (bjh)
March 29, 2019 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Mohawk Industries, Inc. for Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation. (Achey, Wesley)
March 29, 2019 Filing 2 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (bjh)
March 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8545945) filed by Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exh A, #3 Exh B, #4 Exh C, #5 Exh D, #6 Exh E, #7 Exh F)(bjh) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation v. Brumlow Mills, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brumlow Mills, Inc.
Represented By: Preston Hamilton Heard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation
Represented By: Wesley Cameron Achey
Represented By: Matthew Wolff Howell
Represented By: Sean Boudreau Bedford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?