McDougal v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| David NcDougal and David McDougal |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 4:2021cv00151 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 20109 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: The above-entitled action is presently before the Court pursuant to the filing of the parties' Amended Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Schedule #10 . The Court has reviewed and approves the parties Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Schedule. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the four-month discovery deadline is January 27, 2022. Any motions to amend the pleadings must have obtained prior permission of the court to file any motion to amend. Any Motions for Summary Judgment must be filed by February 27, 2022, and if no Motions for Summary Judgment are filed, the Proposed Consolidated Pretrial Order will be due on February 27, 2022. However, if a Motion for Summary Judgment is filed, the Proposed Consolidated Pretrial Order will be due within 30 days of the Court's ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to submit this action on July 2, 2022, if the parties have not filed a Motion for Summary Judgment or Proposed Pretrial Order. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 9/29/2021. (tcc)
|
| Filing 10 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by David McDougal. (Moss, John) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Clarida, Daryl) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Discovery ends on 1/27/2022.(Clarida, Daryl) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Joseph P. Sirbak, II Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11202517).. Attorney Joseph P. Sirbak, II added appearing on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (nmb) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Hilary H. Adams on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Adams, Hilary) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Joseph P. Sirbak, II Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11202517).by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Clarida, Daryl) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daryl Glenn Clarida on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Clarida, Daryl) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by David McDougal. Norfolk Southern Railway Company served on 8/9/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. (Moss, John) |
|
Filing 3
Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 8/9/21. (rlb)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (dob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by David McDougal. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC11165840) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 8/9/2021 to edit typo (dob). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
