Cloer v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
| Amy Cloer |
| Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00189 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Harold L Murphy |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerks Notation re #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement approved by Judge Harold L. Murphy. (smj) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Walmart, Inc. for Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc..(Corbin, Peter) |
| Filing 7 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. Discovery ends on 4/22/2022.(Corbin, Peter) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 6
ORDER (by docket entry only) GRANTING #4 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.'s Answer is now due on or before 11/26/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 11/02/2021. (drg)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas for all further proceedings NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 4:21-cv-189-HLM-CMS. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/1/21. (klb)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Corbin, Peter) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Amy Cloer. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. served on 10/15/2021, answer due 11/5/2021. (McCown, John) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (tmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Amy Cloer. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11311691) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cloer v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy Cloer | |
| Represented By: | John Robert McCown |
| Represented By: | Randolph Scott Jackson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Abigail Jane Larimer |
| Represented By: | Peter Reed Corbin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
