Brewer v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
| Levi Brewer |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company and James Neesmith |
| 4:2021cv00241 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to Joseph P Sirbak, II. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 1/31/2022. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(dob)
|
|
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #10 APPLICATION for Admission of Joseph P. Sirbak, II Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11538487). Attorney William Patton Hahn added appearing on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (cdg)
|
|
Filing 10
APPLICATION for Admission of Joseph P. Sirbak, II Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11538487).by James Neesmith, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Clarida, Daryl) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
|
|
Filing 9
Notice for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): 3/16/22-3/22/22, 5/6/22, 5/9/22, 5/27/22, 5/31/22, 7/5/22, 11/23/22, 11/28/22, 12/23/22, 12/26/22, 12/27/22, by Daryl Glenn Clarida. (Clarida, Daryl) Modified on 1/25/2022 to consolidate dates(tmf).
|
|
Filing 8
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by James Neesmith, Norfolk Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Clarida, Daryl)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by James Neesmith, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Discovery ends on 6/23/2022.(Clarida, Daryl) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
|
|
Filing 6
Return of Service Executed by Levi Brewer. Norfolk Southern Railway Company served on 1/6/2022, answer due 1/27/2022. (Warshauer, Michael)
|
|
ORDER (by docket entry only): The Court GRANTS the #5 Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant James Neesmith to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint. The time within which Defendant Neesmith is required to answer Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to and through Monday, January 24, 2022. Ordered by Judge Michael L. Brown on 1/7/2022. (jpk)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by Norfolk Southern Railway Company of Stipulation Extending Time For Defendant James Neesmith to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint (Adams, Hilary)
|
|
Filing 4
Return of Service Executed by Levi Brewer. James Neesmith served on 12/20/2021, answer due 1/10/2022. (Shuping, Trent)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/26/2021. (jpk)
|
|
Filing 2
Electronic Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company, James Neesmith. (Attachments: #1 Summons Neesmith)(tmf)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Levi Brewer (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11465852) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
