Jones v. State of Georgia
Devin C. Jones |
State of Georgia |
4:2022cv00154 |
July 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Walter E Johnson |
Harold L Murphy |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (jpa)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING the #2 Final Report and Recommendation and DISMISSING this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Court DIRECTS the clerk to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 8/17/22. (jpa) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Devin C. Jones re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #5 Clerk's Judgment. (jpa) |
Civil Case Terminated. (jpa) |
Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, to District Judge Harold L. Murphy. (jpa) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Order and Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 7/25/22. (klb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/26/2022: #1 order) (klb). |
Filing 2 ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Devin C. Jones. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that (1) the construed Petition #1 be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and (2) a certificate of appealability be DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 7/25/22. (klb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Devin C. Jones re #2 ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #3 Order for Service of Order and Final Report and Recommendation,. (klb) |
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis for the purpose of dismissal only. (found in the text of the Order & Final Report & Recommendation). Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 7/25/22. c:Financial Office(klb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Devin C. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Submission of #1 Complaint, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (dob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. State of Georgia | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Devin C. Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: State of Georgia | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.