Capehart v. Whitfield County Sheriff's Office et al
| Randy Lee Capehart |
| Whitfield County Sheriff's Office and Mrs. Walker |
| 4:2022cv00247 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Harold L Murphy |
| William M Ray |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER for Service of #4 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 1/4/23. (klb)
|
|
Filing 4
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Randy Lee Capehart. Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's November 15, 2022, Order to complete and return this Courts form 1983 complaint and an IFP request. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the present case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff's failure to follow a lawful order of this Court. Plaintiff may refile the case under a new docket number when he is prepared to comply with this Court's orders. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 1/4/23. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Randy Lee Capehart re #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #5 Order for Service of Final Report and Recommendation. (klb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Randy Lee Capehart re Case Assigned/Reassigned. (jpa) |
| Submission of #3 Order, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (jpa) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge William M. Ray, II. Judge Harold L. Murphy no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 4:22-cv-247-WMR-WEJ. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (jpa) |
| Submission of #3 Order ruling on IFP, Forms Sent, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (tmf) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE in Forma Pauperis. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, he is ORDERED, within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, to complete and return (1) the form 1983 complaint, and (2) the IFP affidavit, with all required information, signatures, certifications, and attachments. (Forms sent to party: Affidavit and Authorization; 42:1983 Forms; ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/15/22. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Randy Lee Capehart re #3 Order and Forms Sent. (klb) |
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (tmf) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Randy Lee Capehart. (tmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Randy Lee Capehart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
