Byfield v. Ippoliti et al
| Richardo Byfield |
| Michelle Hart Ippoliti, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC and Flagstar Bank |
| 4:2023cv00002 |
| January 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William M. Ray, II: Hearing held on 3/9/2023. The Defendant, Flagstar advised the Court of the Plaintiffs recent filing of Bankruptcy. However, the Defendant states due to the Plaintiffs number and the timing of filed Bankruptcy cases, the automatic stay of this case does not apply. The Court found it was proper to proceed with the hearing today. The Court directed the defendant to file a proposed order regarding the automatic stay. The defendant raised the issue that service has not been perfected. The Court finds that services has not been perfected and further finds it does not have jurisdiction to proceed today. The Court directed the Plaintiff to perfect service within the next sixty days which shall include duly issued summons. (Court Reporter Geraldine Glover)(tas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn E. Glover on behalf of Flagstar Bank (Glover, Glenn) |
| Filing 9 Return of Service Executed by Richardo Byfield. Flagstar Bank served on 2/23/2023, answer due 3/16/2023; Michelle Hart Ippoliti served on 3/1/2023, answer due 3/22/2023. (tas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Strike #7 Notice of Appearance, a Corporation Cannot Represent Itself in Court by Richardo Byfield. (tas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Scott Krivo on behalf of McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC (Krivo, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Quash Service of Process with Brief In Support by Flagstar Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Anderson, Keith) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion re: #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order IMMEDIATE HEARING REQUESTED Motion Hearing set for 3/9/2023 at 11:00 AM in ROME Courtroom 353 before Judge William M. Ray II. The Court directs that the Plaintiff must obtain service on each of the Defendants pursuant to Federal law and file proof of such service with the Court prior to the hearing or the hearing will be continued from this date. (tas) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Richardo Byfield re #5 Notice of Hearing on Motion. (tas) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Richardo Byfield. Flagstar Bank served on 1/25/2023, answer due 2/15/2023. (tas) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Richardo Byfield. Michelle Hart Ippoliti served on 1/24/2023, answer due 2/14/2023. (tas) |
| Submission of #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order IMMEDIATE HEARING REQUESTED, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (dob) |
| Submission of #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order IMMEDIATE HEARING REQUESTED, to District Judge William M. Ray II. (dob) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order IMMEDIATE HEARING REQUESTEDby Richardo Byfield. (dob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Richardo Byfield. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 400000031) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Receipt)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
