Patel et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Pareshkumar Patel and Sejalben Patel |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Tracy Renaud, Daniel M. Renaud and The United States |
| 4:2023cv00022 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to United States Attorney-Northern District of Georgia. (dob) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Daniel M. Renaud. (dob) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland. (dob) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (dob) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Tracy Renaud. (dob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Pareshkumar Patel, Sejalben Patel. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC12393598) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D Part 1, #5 Exhibit D Part 2, #6 Exhibit E Part 1, #7 Exhibit E Part 2, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
