Le et al v. Jaddou
| Sanh Van Le and Linh Thuy Nguyen |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 4:2024cv00106 |
| April 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (dob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Sanh Van Le, Linh Thuy Nguyen. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC13369711) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Principal Plaintiffs passport biographical page, visa, and admission sta, #2 Exhibit Receipt for Form I-485, Application for Adjustment of Status for Princip, #3 Exhibit Receipt for Form I-485, Application for Adjustment of Status for derivat, #4 Errata Approval Notice for Form I-140 Immigrant Petition for Immigrant Worker, #5 Exhibit USCIS Historic Case Processing Time report, #6 Exhibit USCIS.gov Case Processing times, #7 Exhibit April 2024 Visa Bulletin, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
