Patel et al v. Jaddou et al
| Shitalkumar P. Patel, Sarla S. Patel and Raj S. Patel |
| The United States and Ur Jaddou |
| 4:2024cv00193 |
| August 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCUMENT FILED IN INCORRECT CASE Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou. (dob) Modified on 9/17/2024 (dob). |
| Filing 4 DOCUMENT FILED IN INCORRECT CASE Electronic Summons Issued as to The US Attorney NDGA. (dob) Modified on 9/17/2024 (dob). |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to The United States Attorney, NDGA. (dob) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou. (dob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Shitalkumar P. Patel, Sarla S. Patel, Raj S. Patel. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC13639254) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B-1, #3 Exhibit B-2, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D-1, #6 Exhibit D-2, #7 Exhibit D-3, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
