Banks v. Roe et al
| Frederick Banks |
| Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar, Soo Song, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Sean Langford, Robert Werner, Scott Smith, Mike Pompeo, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency |
| 1:2017cv00316 |
| July 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Outside state of Hawaii |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION PURSUANT TO 28U.S.C. § 1915(g) re 1 , 2 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 7/19/2017. "Because this Court lacks jurisdiction over Banks's claims and he may not proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), this action is DISMISSED and Banks's IFP application is DENIED. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case and note this dismissal is pursua nt to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Frederick Banks shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on July 19, 2017.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
