Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01416
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wilson v. Niagara County Jail et al
as 1:2026cv01564
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Wilson, III
Defendant:
Niagara County Jail, Niagara County Sheriff's Department, Sergeant Kratz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2026mi00112
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gabriel Dean
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Georgia Ethics Department, Georgia State Election Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2026cv05153
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Smith
Defendant:
Adam E Ramirez and Jacqulynn Faith Cassey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01163
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cox v. Schuyler County et al
as 6:2026cv06654
Plaintiff:
Samantha E. Cox
Defendant:
Schuyler County, Kevin Rumsey, E. Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harper et al
as 1:2026cv01564
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Harper and Lieutenant Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis v. Smith et al
as 2:2026cv00936
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Respondent:
Scott Smith and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
