Cases 1 - 10 of 210
WASHINGTON v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv23179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Doe et al
as 6:2023cv06719
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Smith
Defendant:
John Doe and Niagara Falls Polices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christensen
as 1:2023cv02052
Petitioner:
Stephen Scott Smith
Respondent:
Warden D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
ANDERSON JR. et al v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2023cv20535
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON JR., JOSE N.M.I. VALENTINE, ISAAC JERDAN and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, MR. SIMS, M. BRANTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Filicetti et al
as 6:2023cv06533
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Michael Filicetti, Under Sheriff Michael P. Dunn, Chief Suess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv16631
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ELLEN E. LOUGHNEY, ERIC R. SHENKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv00405
Petitioner:
Ronnie Scott Smith
Respondent:
E. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Meyers v. Ronnie Scott
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SERGEANT DIAL and others
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-6035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
