Anderson, et al v. Idaho, State of

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Idaho District Court Anderson, et al v. Idaho, State of

Anderson, et al v. Idaho, State of

Case Number:	1:2002cv00204
Filed:	May 3, 2002
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
Presiding Judge:	Larry M. Boyle
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2015	Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 22 ) is DENIED, and this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
March 31, 2014	Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 21 Petitioner's Request for Judicial Notice; finding as moot 32 Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal (replaced by Amended Motion 38 -2); denying as moot 35 Petitioner's Motion or Objection to Respondent's Notice of Lodging of State Court Records; denying 35 Petitioner's Motion to Compel; granting 38 Respondent's Motion for Leave to File; denying without prejudice 38 -2 Respondent's Amended Motion f or Partial Summary Dismissal; granting 40 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; granting 42 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; finding as moot 43 Petitioner's Motion to O pposing Respondent's Amended Partial Summary Dismissal Motion. Respondent shall file an answer to the Amended Petition within 90 daysafter entry of this Order, addressing all of Petitioners claims. Petitioner shall file a reply (formerly called a traverse), rebutting Respondents answer and brief, which shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of theanswer. Respondent has the option of filing a sur-reply within 14 days afterservice of the reply. Signed by Judge Larry M. Boyle. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2015

Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 22 ) is DENIED, and this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

March 31, 2014

Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 21 Petitioner's Request for Judicial Notice; finding as moot 32 Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal (replaced by Amended Motion 38 -2); denying as moot 35 Petitioner's Motion or Objection to Respondent's Notice of Lodging of State Court Records; denying 35 Petitioner's Motion to Compel; granting 38 Respondent's Motion for Leave to File; denying without prejudice 38 -2 Respondent's Amended Motion f or Partial Summary Dismissal; granting 40 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; granting 42 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; finding as moot 43 Petitioner's Motion to O pposing Respondent's Amended Partial Summary Dismissal Motion. Respondent shall file an answer to the Amended Petition within 90 daysafter entry of this Order, addressing all of Petitioners claims. Petitioner shall file a reply (formerly called a traverse), rebutting Respondents answer and brief, which shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of theanswer. Respondent has the option of filing a sur-reply within 14 days afterservice of the reply. Signed by Judge Larry M. Boyle. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson, et al v. Idaho, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?