Mubita v. Daniel Weaver et al
Kanay Mubita |
Daniel Weaver, David Duke and Paul Kwaitkowski |
1:2007cv00549 |
February 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Ada - Southern |
B. Lynn Winmill |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. All of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm) |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Disclosure of Discovery (Docket No. 34 ) is DENIED in part, deemed MOOT in part. Defendants' Request for Attorney Fees in their Response to Motion (DocketNo. 36 ) is DENIED. Plai ntiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 35 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification (Docket No. 42 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm) |
Filing 33 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Stay; denying without prejudice 25 Motion to Lift the Stay and Partial Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 29 Motion to Continue. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.