O Bar Cattle Co. v. Owyhee Feeders, Inc.
| O Bar Cattle Co. |
| Owyhee Feeders, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv00149 |
| March 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Canyon - Southern |
| Edward J. Lodge |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 221 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. No. 188 ) is DENIED. Defendants Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. No. 193 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall DENY both Parties' respective Bills of Costs. (Dkt. Nos. 190 , 191 ). Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|
|
Filing
217
AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER re 216 Order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|
|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 129 MOTION in Limine filed by O Bar Cattle Co., Denying 128 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Rebuttal Expert Witness David Bechtol DVM filed by Owyhee Feeders, Inc., Finding as Moot 152 MOTION to Strike e Declaration of J. Bryan Quesenberry in Support of Reply to Defendant/Counterclaimant Owyhee Feeders, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine [CR 150] filed by Owyhee Feeders, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|
|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Owyhee Feeders, Inc., Granting 106 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff O Bar Cattle Co's First Amended Answer to Owyhee Feeders, Inc's Counterclaims filed by O Bar Cattle Co. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Denying 110 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant O Bar Cattle Co.'s Rule 56(f) Motion. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: O Bar Cattle Co. v. Owyhee Feeders, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: O Bar Cattle Co. | |
| Represented By: | John N Zarian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Owyhee Feeders, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
