Dollar Douglas et al v. Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians et al
Plaintiff: Deborah J Dollar Douglas, Lisa R Dollar Shinaver and Elizabeth G Dollar Wiley
Defendant: Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians, Harvey Hopkins, Betty Jean Parker Arterberry, Margie Rojes, Augusto Pena, Gabriel Naverez and Does 1 thru 200
Case Number: 1:2008cv00159
Filed: April 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Payette - Southern
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Lodge
Presiding Judge: Larry M. Boyle
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM ORDER Adopting 44 Report and Recommendations, Granting 30 MOTION to Dismiss, Finding as Moot 46 MOTION to Withdraw filed by Deborah J Dollar Douglas, Denying 48 Second MOTION to Amend filed by Deborah J Dollar Douglas, Denying 42 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Deborah J Dollar Douglas. This matter is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
November 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the 30 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint be granted. Objections to R&R due by 11/21/2008. Signed by Judge Larry M. Boyle. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
October 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- Adopting in its entirety 41 Report and Recommendations. Therefore 20 MOTION for Default Judgment is Moot and 35 MOTION for Default Judgment is Denied. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
October 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS That Plaintiff's 20 MOTION for Default Judgment as to filed by Deborah J Dollar Douglas should be denied as moot ( Objections to R&R due by 10/23/2008). It is hereby ordered that Defendants' 40 Unopp osed MOTION for Protective Order and for Order Staying Discovery Pending Resolution of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Larry M. Boyle. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dollar Douglas et al v. Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah J Dollar Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa R Dollar Shinaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth G Dollar Wiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harvey Hopkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Betty Jean Parker Arterberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margie Rojes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Augusto Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gabriel Naverez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 thru 200
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?