Mubita v. State of Idaho

Mubita v. State of Idaho

Defendant:	State of Idaho
Petitioner:	Kanay Mubita
Case Number:	1:2008cv00310
Filed:	July 29, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2015	Filing 54 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 50 is DENIED. Petitioner's Motion to Apply One or Both Exceptions to the Defaulted Claims 40 is DENIED. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer 43 is GRANTED. Respondent's Motion to Seal Third Supplemental Lodging 45 is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. The claims in the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 3 are DEN IED and DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
September 28, 2013	Filing 39 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal 29 is GRANTED in part: Claim One is dismissed with prejudice, and any state law issues or Fourth Amendment issues raised in Claim Three are dismissed with prejudi ce. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal 29 is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED in part. Within the next 30 days, Petitioner may file a motion and memorandum asking the Court to apply one or both exceptionsto the defaulted claims. Petitioner 's Motion to Show Cause Why Respondent Has Not Filed an Answer 31 is DENIED. Respondent shall file an answer to the remaining claims within 90 days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2015

Filing 54 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 50 is DENIED. Petitioner's Motion to Apply One or Both Exceptions to the Defaulted Claims 40 is DENIED. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer 43 is GRANTED. Respondent's Motion to Seal Third Supplemental Lodging 45 is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. The claims in the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 3 are DEN IED and DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

September 28, 2013

Filing 39 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal 29 is GRANTED in part: Claim One is dismissed with prejudice, and any state law issues or Fourth Amendment issues raised in Claim Three are dismissed with prejudi ce. Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal 29 is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED in part. Within the next 30 days, Petitioner may file a motion and memorandum asking the Court to apply one or both exceptionsto the defaulted claims. Petitioner 's Motion to Show Cause Why Respondent Has Not Filed an Answer 31 is DENIED. Respondent shall file an answer to the remaining claims within 90 days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mubita v. State of Idaho
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kanay Mubita
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: State of Idaho
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?