Wang v. Chertoff et al
Plaintiff: Fei Wang
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Jonathan R. Scharfen and F Gerard Heinauer
Case Number: 1:2008cv00429
Filed: October 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Other Immigration Actions Office
County: Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge: Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration, or in the alternative, Motion to Order Mr. Wang to Amend his Complaint to add the Department of State as an indispensable party 18 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Sta tus Conference 39 is DENIED as MOOT; Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement the Record 40 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is GRANTED. Defendants are ORDERED to adjudicate Mr. Wang's pending Application for Adjust ment of Status within 10 days of the availability of a visa number. Defendants are further ORDERED to show cause by affidavit, which shall be filed on the first day of each month, as to why Mr. Wang's application for adjustment of status canno t be favorably adjudicated at that time. If at any time the Court considers the reasons advanced therein insufficient, the Court will hold a hearing and provide notice of an opportunity for Mr. Wang to appear. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
March 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Denying 4 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Department of Homeland Security. Defendants are to file an Answer within 10 days from the date of this Decision. A scheduling conference will be set between the parties, and a scheduling conference order will be forthcoming. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wang v. Chertoff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fei Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Chertoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan R. Scharfen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: F Gerard Heinauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?