Stakey v. Stander

Stakey v. Stander

Plaintiff:	Joey T Stakey
Defendant:	Klint H Stander
Case Number:	1:2009cv00094
Filed:	March 3, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 26, 2011	Filing 85 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granted as to Stakey's federal claims against all CMS Defendants and against defendants Blades, Hardison, and J Smith. Denied as to Stakey' s negligence claims. Stakey's negligence claims are dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Stakey may re-file these claims in state court. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
March 10, 2011	Filing 77 ORDER denying 59 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 66 Motion for a Court Expert. Plaintiff may have until 5/31/2011, in which to file any supplemental response to the pending 70 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants may have until 6/17/2011, to file any reply to the supplement. No further briefing shall be submitted after that date by either party. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 26, 2011

Filing 85 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granted as to Stakey's federal claims against all CMS Defendants and against defendants Blades, Hardison, and J Smith. Denied as to Stakey' s negligence claims. Stakey's negligence claims are dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Stakey may re-file these claims in state court. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

March 10, 2011

Filing 77 ORDER denying 59 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 66 Motion for a Court Expert. Plaintiff may have until 5/31/2011, in which to file any supplemental response to the pending 70 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants may have until 6/17/2011, to file any reply to the supplement. No further briefing shall be submitted after that date by either party. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stakey v. Stander
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joey T Stakey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Klint H Stander
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?