Jones v. Valdez et al
Robert Richard Jones |
Phillip Valdez and Idaho Attorney General |
1:2009cv00132 |
March 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Ada - Southern |
Mikel H. Williams |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER- Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 45 ) is Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Dkt. 46 ) isGRANTED. Petitioner's First and Second Motions for Enlargement of Time to File Res ponse to Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 49, 51) are GRANTED. Docket Nos. 54-8 through 54-28, which were mistakenly filed in this case, are STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jm) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss. Respondent shall file Answer no later than 12/30/2010. Respondent shall file a Motion for Summary Judgment on the remaining claims no later than 2/26/2011. Res ponses shall be due no later than 3/31/2011. Replies, if any, shall be due no later than 4/15/2011. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.