Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company et al
Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc. |
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company |
1:2009cv00246 |
May 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Ada - Southern |
Candy W Dale |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 137 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 59 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Motion in Opposition (Dkt. 81 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate and St ay Discovery on Plaintiffs Bad Faith Claim (Dkt. 87 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. 90 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm) |
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 48 Motion to Dismiss with leave given to Defendants to file an amended counterclaim consistent with the Courts decision herein. Any counterclaim must be filed on or before September 3, 2010.. Signed by Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.