Burton et al v. Countrywide Bank FSB et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 8, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for granting 59 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; incorporating and adopting 63 Report and Recommendation; dismissing in its entirety 58 Amended Complaint; granting 69 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|March 22, 2012
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 54 Report and Recommendations ; denying as moot 38 Motion for In Rem proceeding; granting in part 18 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. 10) is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT PR EJUDICE as to all claims except Plaintiffs First and Second Causes of Action, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Fourth Cause of Action in part, as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs shall file a Second Amended Complaint in accordanc e with the limitations and direction in the Report and Recommendation. The Second Amended Complaint shall set forth their remaining claims with thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiffs failure to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days will result in a termination of this action as to all claims. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?