Beeson v. Copsey et al
Justin Milo Beeson |
Cheri Copsey, David Navarro, Idaho Legislators, Idaho State Supreme Court Judges, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Idaho Department of Corrections and State of Idaho |
1:2010cv00454 |
September 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Ada - Southern |
Ronald E Bush |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER deeming as moot and denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Dismiss; deeming as moot and denying without prejudice 19 Motion for Reconsideration; deeming as moot and denying without prejudice 20 Motion to Supplement Complaint; denying 22 Motion to Strike; denying 23 Motion to Strike. The Court will allow Beeson 30 days from the date of this Order to pay the complete $350 filing fee. Beeson is advised that if he does not pay the filing fee by that date, his complaint may be dismissed. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm) |
Filing 11 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 7 Motion to Clarify; denying without prejudice 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.