Creative Co-op, Inc. v. The Elizabeth Lucas Company et al
Creative Co-op, Inc. |
The Elizabeth Lucas Company, Elizabeth Lucas and Scott Lucas |
The Elizabeth Lucas Company, Scott Lucas and Elizabeth Lucas |
Creative Co-op, Inc. |
1:2011cv00116 |
March 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Blaine - Southern |
Edward J. Lodge |
Copyrights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Amended counterclaims are due by March 28, 2012. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by kb) |
Filing 64 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND MEDIATION CONFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ADR SETTLEMENT WEEK IN THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this matter shall be referred to JAMS Mediator Randall Newsome for the Courts ADR Resolution Roundup Settlement Week Program. The Mediation shall be held on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. at the James A. McClure Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Boise, Idaho, Courtroom #4, 5th Floor. Signed by Judge Ronald E Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by krb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.