Valley County v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
Plaintiff: |
Valley County |
Defendant: |
United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, United States Forest Service, Tom Tidwell, Harvey Forsgren, Brent L Larson and Keith Lannom |
Case Number: |
1:2011cv00233 |
Filed: |
May 19, 2011 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
Office: |
Boise - Southern Office |
County: |
Valley - Southern |
Presiding Judge: |
B. Lynn Winmill |
Nature of Suit: |
Environmental Matters |
Cause of Action: |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 31, 2015 |
Filing
129
ORDER granting 128 Motion to Clarify/Amend. The Memorandum Decision and Order(docket no. 124 ) is AMENDED to reflect that the Forest Service must only re-evaluate those Management Areas or portions of those Management Areas that were covered by th e McCall/Krassel ROD. This is specifically Management Areas 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13, and portions of Management Areas 6 and 9. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
January 5, 2015 |
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion to reconsider (docket no. 111 ) is GRANTED, and the Court finds that the 2010 EA and associated FONSI violate NEPA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the motion to interven e (docket no. 119 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is granted to the extent it seeks permissive intervention for Adams County and Idaho County, with the restrictions set forth in the Memorandum Decision. It is denied to the extent it seeks intervention for Washington County. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
July 7, 2014 |
Filing
121
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion for extension of time 120 is GRANTED, and Defendants shall file their response by no later than 7/21/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
February 11, 2014 |
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 91 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the parties shall contact the Courts Clerk Jamie G earhart to set up a telephone conference with Staff Attorney David Metcalf to set a briefing schedule on remedy issues. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
October 1, 2013 |
Filing
96
ORDER granting 95 Motion to Stay, and all time limits and deadlines in this case with the one exception listed below - are extended for a period of time equal to the duration of the lapse in appropriations to the Department of Justice. Depositions and court hearings are vacated. The parties shall cooperatively establish new dates for depositions. HOWEVER, this stay does not apply to applications for emergency relief of any type in stayed cases. Thus, motions for temporary restraining orders a nd preliminary injunctions will proceed. This Order shall apply nunc pro tunc to 10/1/2013. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
April 15, 2013 |
Filing
84
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Valley County's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 7/15/2013. The Government's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment due by 8/19/2013. Valley County's Opposition and Reply Brief due by 9/23/2013. The Government' s Reply Brief due by 10/11/2013. ADR Plan is due 30 days after resolution of the dispositive motions. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?