Gilbert et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
| Jalene Gilbert and Tom Gilbert |
| Bank of America N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Recontrust Company, N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2011cv00272 |
| June 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Canyon - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 26 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 13 Motion to Dismiss; granting 14 Motion to Take Judicial Notice; granting 22 Motion to Take Judicial Notice. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend and shall have 14 days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint. If no Amended Complaint is filed by the deadline, the Court will dismiss matter with prejudice, by separate order and judgment. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
