Wolf v. Smith

Wolf v. Smith

Petitioner:	Andrew J.J. Wolf
Respondent:	Johanna Smith
Case Number:	1:2011cv00404
Filed:	August 29, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Edward J. Lodge
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 26, 2015	Filing 103 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 95 Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel; denying 96 Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing; denying 98 Petitioner's Motion to Supplement Reply; granting 101 Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; denying 11 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
March 14, 2013	Filing 67 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 65 Motion to Reconsider, Amend, Alter, or Vacate Order; granting 30 Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal. Claims 2-13 are DISMISSED with prejudice. No later than 60 days from the date of this Order, Responden ts shall file an answer to the remaining claim or claims in the Amended Petition 11 . Within 30 days of receiving an answer, Petitioner may file a reply (formerly a traverse). Respondents may file a sur-reply within 14 days of receiving a reply. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 26, 2015

Filing 103 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 95 Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel; denying 96 Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing; denying 98 Petitioner's Motion to Supplement Reply; granting 101 Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; denying 11 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

March 14, 2013

Filing 67 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 65 Motion to Reconsider, Amend, Alter, or Vacate Order; granting 30 Motion for Partial Summary Dismissal. Claims 2-13 are DISMISSED with prejudice. No later than 60 days from the date of this Order, Responden ts shall file an answer to the remaining claim or claims in the Amended Petition 11 . Within 30 days of receiving an answer, Petitioner may file a reply (formerly a traverse). Respondents may file a sur-reply within 14 days of receiving a reply. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wolf v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew J.J. Wolf
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Johanna Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?