Mitchell Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Mr. Electric Corp. et al
Teresa A. Mitchell, Danny G. Mitchell and Mitchell Enterprises, Inc. |
Mr. Electric Corp. and The Dwyer Group |
1:2011cv00537 |
November 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Ada - Southern |
Ronald E Bush |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 34 ) is GRANTED in its entirety. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: Motion to defer Consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and to Amend the Scheduling Order, granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Discovery; granting 48 Motion to Expedite Heari ng. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants motion for summary judgment within 28 days of this Memorandum Decision and Order. Plaintiffs may submit a rebuttal report speaking to the Second Hatchett Report; said report shall be disclosed within 28 days of this Memorandum Decision and Order. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.