Abbott et al v. Reinke et al
| Dennis E Abbott, Jeffery T Garner, John Lloyd and Robert L Brown |
| Idaho Department of Heath and Welfare, Idaho Commissions of Pardons and Parole, Brent Reinke, Idaho District Courts, Idaho Department of Corrections and Olivia Craven |
| 1:2011cv00561 |
| November 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER dismissing without prejudice 2 Complaint; denying as moot 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 3 Motion to Certify Class; denying as moot 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying as moot 10 Motion for Or der to Show Cause; denying 11 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff Abbot may file his amended complaint in this action. Each other Plaintiff must file his amended complaint in a separate action (referencing its origin in this action), but will be entitled to take advantage of the original filing date of the joint Complaint for statute of limitations purposes. Each Plaintiff will be responsible to pay a portion of the original filing fee. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
