Zivkovic v. Reinke

Zivkovic v. Reinke

Petitioner:	David Zivkovic
Respondent:	Brent Reinke
Case Number:	1:2011cv00624
Filed:	December 13, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 31, 2013	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer; deeming timely 21 Response to Habeas Petition; denying and dismissing with prejudice 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
March 6, 2013	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss; deeming as moot 16 Motion to Submit for Decision. Claim 2 in the Petition for 3 Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. No later than 60 days f rom the date of this Order, Respondent shall file ananswer to the remaining claim or claims in the Petition. Respondent shallbrief all claims within the answer. Within 30 days of receiving Respondents answer, Petitioner shall file a reply (formerly k nown as a traverse), and Respondent may file a sur-reply within 14 days of receiving Petitioners reply. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 31, 2013

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer; deeming timely 21 Response to Habeas Petition; denying and dismissing with prejudice 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

March 6, 2013

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss; deeming as moot 16 Motion to Submit for Decision. Claim 2 in the Petition for 3 Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. No later than 60 days f rom the date of this Order, Respondent shall file ananswer to the remaining claim or claims in the Petition. Respondent shallbrief all claims within the answer. Within 30 days of receiving Respondents answer, Petitioner shall file a reply (formerly k nown as a traverse), and Respondent may file a sur-reply within 14 days of receiving Petitioners reply. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zivkovic v. Reinke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: David Zivkovic
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Brent Reinke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?