Diversified Metal Products, Incorporated v. Odom Industries, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Idaho District Court Diversified Metal Products, Incorporated v. Odom Industries, Inc.

Diversified Metal Products, Incorporated v. Odom Industries, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Diversified Metal Products, Incorporated
Defendant:	Odom Industries, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2012cv00162
Filed:	March 30, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2012	Filing 19 ORDER re: 18 Notice of denial of DMP's motion to dismiss by the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, and this Court's earlier decision staying this case 17 . It is hereby ordered that the stay be lifted and that this case be dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
July 12, 2012	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Stay. The action is hereby STAYED pending resolution of the Motion to Dismiss in Ohio. The parties shall notify this Court of the Ohio courts decision as soon as it is issued. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2012

Filing 19 ORDER re: 18 Notice of denial of DMP's motion to dismiss by the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, and this Court's earlier decision staying this case 17 . It is hereby ordered that the stay be lifted and that this case be dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

July 12, 2012

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Stay. The action is hereby STAYED pending resolution of the Motion to Dismiss in Ohio. The parties shall notify this Court of the Ohio courts decision as soon as it is issued. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diversified Metal Products, Incorporated v. Odom Industries, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diversified Metal Products, Incorporated
Represented By:	Joe Meuleman
Represented By:	Geoffrey J McConnell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Odom Industries, Inc.
Represented By:	Richard C Boardman
Represented By:	Christine Salmi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?