Storms v. Hauss et al
| Stacey James Storms |
| Angie LNU and Hauss |
| 1:2012cv00179 |
| April 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Blaine - Southern |
| Candy W Dale |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Defendant Hass's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust 30 is DENIED without prejudice. Defendant Hass's Motion File Documents Under Seal 37 is GRANTED as to the Affidavit and Exhibits fil ed at Docket No. 31. Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Prisoner Complaint Form 48 is DENIED. Defendant Twitchell's Motion for Summary Judgment 55 is GRANTED. All claims against her are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant Twitchell's Mot ion to File Documents Under Seal 58 isGRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court shall unseal theMotion, Memorandum, and Statement of Undisputed Facts (Dkt. 55, 55-1,and 55-2). The Affidavits and exhibits shall remained sealed (Dkt. 55- 3 and55-4). Plaintiff's Motions to Appoint Counsel (Dkts. 56 , 68 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff shall have 30 days after entry of this Order to provide anysupporting evidence he has to support his medical claims against DefendantHass.. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
