Markcus v. Twin Falls County Sheriff's Office et al
| Markcus Raymond May |
| Lou Probasco, Twin Falls County Sheriff's Office, Tom Carter, Jake Benson, Allen Alvey, Heartgrave, Randall Slickers and Does I-X |
| 1:2012cv00228 |
| May 14, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: The following claims are DISMISSED with prejudice: (1) all claims against Defendants Probasco and Slickers; (2) all claims against Twin Falls County Sheriff's Office; (3) all claims against Tom Car ter. The following claims are DISMISSED without prejudice: (1) claims against Defendant Hartgrave; (2) claims against Nurse Jane Doe and Does I-X; (3) all claims of verbal abuse. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 13 is MOOT; Defendant's Mo tion for Summary Judgment 13 is GRANTED in part and denied in part. The parties shall contact the ADR Director, Susie Boring-Headlee, within the next 10 days if they are interested in attending a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
