Bown v. Reinke et al
| William A. Bown |
| Brent D. Reinke, Rona Siegert, Randy E Blades, Jimmie Crosby, Daniel Mettie, Becky A. Blake, Ronald Pixler, Timothy Richardson, Corizon, Inc, Karen B Barrett, April Dawson, Cassie Richins and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 1:2012cv00262 |
| May 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Ronald E Bush |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Unseal (Dkt.[ 176] ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
|
|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 126 Motion to Retain Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED, that the motion for summary judgment (docket no. 100 ) and the motion for protective order (docket no. 108 ) are DENIED. The motion to stay or for additional discovery (docket no. 102 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS - NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for attorney fees and costs (docket no. 96 ) is GRANTED, and that plaintiff be awarded costs andattorney fees from defendants as fol lows: Attorney fees of $39,611.20, paralegal fees of $1,261.00, costs of $2,627.40, for a total award of $43,499.60. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER graning 79 MOTION to Compel; granting 80 MOTION for Attorney Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that IDOC shall provide a person with expertise in computer searches to meet with Bowns counsel and/or computer expert to a gree upon search protocols to ensure that IDOCs ESI is fully searched for the material specified above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that following that computer search, and depending on its results, Bown may return to this Court to pursue a claim of spoli ation. Bowns counsel shall submit his petition for those fees and costs within 20 days from the date of this decision. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
77
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 75 Joint MOTION for Protective Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend 53 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall immediately file his amended complaint. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
