Cook v. Smith

Cook v. Smith

Petitioner:	Steven James Cook
Respondent:	Johanna Smith
Case Number:	1:2012cv00281
Filed:	June 4, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 6, 2013	Filing 41 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Motion Requesting Leave to Amend (Dkt. 32 ) is GRANTED; Petitioner's Motion to Amend Petition (Dkt. 10 ) is DEEMED WITHDRAWN, and the Second Amended Petition (Dkt. 11 ) is STR ICKEN. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18 ) is GRANTED. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 8 ) and this entire action are DISMISSED with prejudice. Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Dkt. 19 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Dkt. 23 ) is GRANTED. The Response filed at Docket No. 27 is considered timely. Petitioner's Motion to File Oversized Statement of Disputed Facts (Dkt. 28 )is GRANTED . Petitioner's Motion Withdrawing Motion for Leave to File SummaryJudgment Motion (Dkt. 31 ) is GRANTED; Petitioner's Motion for Leave toFile a Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. 16 ) is DEEMED WITHDRAWN. The Motions Requesting Leave for Intervention Filed by Ray Nelson (Dkt. 22 ) and Peggy Cook (Dkt. 35 ) are MOOT.. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 6, 2013

Filing 41 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Motion Requesting Leave to Amend (Dkt. 32 ) is GRANTED; Petitioner's Motion to Amend Petition (Dkt. 10 ) is DEEMED WITHDRAWN, and the Second Amended Petition (Dkt. 11 ) is STR ICKEN. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18 ) is GRANTED. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 8 ) and this entire action are DISMISSED with prejudice. Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Dkt. 19 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Dkt. 23 ) is GRANTED. The Response filed at Docket No. 27 is considered timely. Petitioner's Motion to File Oversized Statement of Disputed Facts (Dkt. 28 )is GRANTED . Petitioner's Motion Withdrawing Motion for Leave to File SummaryJudgment Motion (Dkt. 31 ) is GRANTED; Petitioner's Motion for Leave toFile a Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. 16 ) is DEEMED WITHDRAWN. The Motions Requesting Leave for Intervention Filed by Ray Nelson (Dkt. 22 ) and Peggy Cook (Dkt. 35 ) are MOOT.. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven James Cook
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Johanna Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?