Sagan et al v. Idaho Housing and Finance Association et al
||Entities I-X, John/Jane Does, Idaho Housing and Finance Association, Tracy Childers, Mortgage Electronic Registeration Servicing, Inc, Ryan M Fawcett and Stewart Title Company
||Sergey Sagan and Yuliva Sagan
||July 13, 2012
||Idaho District Court
||Boise - Southern Office
||Ada - Southern
||Mikel H. Williams
|Nature of Suit:
||Real Property: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 28, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 66 ) shall be INCORPORATED by reference and ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. 53 , 57 ) are GRANTED. Plaintiffs'Complaint against a ll Defendants is DISMISSED in its entirety without leave to amend. Motion to Take Judicial Notice (Dkt. 54) is GRANTED. Any lis pendens recorded by Plaintiffs related to the real property located at12271 Murchison Street in Boise, Idaho that has not previously been expunged is hereby QUASHED AND EXPUNGED. If an additional order is needed from the Court, Defendants shall provide a proposed order with the necessary language to effectuate expungement. Plaintiffs are ordered ENJOINED from recording any further lis pendens or other documents encumbering title to the aforementioned property without leave of a court of competent jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.