Loftis v. Wengler et al
| Kirk A Loftis |
| Zara Martin, Thomas Kessler, Joseph Cardona, Alec Thacker, Dan Lambert, David Agler, Stander, C Penn, John and Jane Doe and Tim Wengler |
| 1:2012cv00359 |
| July 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Candy W Dale |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. It is hereby ordered: Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider 47 is GRANTED. The Judgment 46 is VACATED. Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend to file a third amended complaint within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Defendant Martin's Motion to Dismiss 37 is GRANTED. Because Plaintiff (who is represented by counsel) has not requested leave to amend his complaint a third time, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915(g). Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
