Gambrel v. Twin Falls County et al
| Kody Gambrel |
| Twin Falls County, Andrew Heikkila, Bradley Terry, Stacey Thomas, John Hubbard, Jimmy Adams and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2012cv00369 |
| July 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Twin Falls - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on defendants' affirmative defenses is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's spoliation claim is DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to later arguments concerning appropriate sanctions for spoliation of evidence. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within seven days of the d ate this Order is signed. The parties shall file a stipulation setting forth an amended discovery deadline and amended dispositive motions deadline, or a joint statement that they cannot agree on those dates, within fourteen days of the date this Order is signed. Signed by Judge William B. Shubb. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
