Smith v. Wengler

Smith v. Wengler

Defendant:	Tim Wengler
Petitioner:	Charles E. Smith
Case Number:	1:2012cv00539
Filed:	October 26, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Candy W Dale
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 8, 2016	Filing 43 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 22 is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
March 29, 2013	Filing 8 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles E. Smith, 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles E. Smith. Petitioner's Application for In Forma Pauperis Status (Docket No. 1) is GRANTED. This case shall be STAYED pending completion of Petitioner's postconviction action in Smith v. State, Ada County Case No. CV-PC 2012-11044. The Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this case. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 8, 2016

Filing 43 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 22 is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

March 29, 2013

Filing 8 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles E. Smith, 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles E. Smith. Petitioner's Application for In Forma Pauperis Status (Docket No. 1) is GRANTED. This case shall be STAYED pending completion of Petitioner's postconviction action in Smith v. State, Ada County Case No. CV-PC 2012-11044. The Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this case. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Wengler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles E. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Wengler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?