Sandru v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 22, 2015
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (Dkt. 33 ) is DENIED. Defendant's Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award (Dkt. 35 ) isGRANTED. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply (Dkt. 47 ) is MOOT. Defendants Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply (Dkt. 52 ) is MOOT. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|September 17, 2013
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying as moot in part 7 Motion to Dismiss or Compel Arbitration; denying as moot 16 Claimants Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 17 Plaintiff's Supplemental Request to Dismiss the Defendants Motion; denying as moot 21 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 23 Request for Permission to File an Amended Statement of Claim; denying as moot 24 Plaintiff Motions that the Court does not have Subject matter Jurisdiction and the D efendants Removal to Federal Court was Improper and Moves that the Case be Remanded Back to the State Court; denying as moot 31 Motion to Strike. The Clerk of the Court shall administratively close this case. The parties may seek to re-open the cas e if any issues related to the arbitration arise that can appropriately be brought to the Court for resolution. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?