Goodwin et al v. Beckley
| Nancy Lindberg, Dale Goodwin, Ann Walch and John Lindberg |
| Wayne N Beckley |
| 1:2013cv00140 |
| March 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees 14 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court will award fees in the amount of $3,632.50. The request for any additional amounts is denied. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM DECISION. The Court AFFIRMS the bankruptcy court's denial of Beckley's motion to alter or amend the judgment. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 5 Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Notice sent to 9th Cir). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
